THE VIRTUE OF
HUMILITY is often overlookedin leadership discussions. Humility is not brought
up when studying some of history. greatest military leaders (such as George S.
Patton, Douglas MacArthur, Napoleon Bonaparte and Erwin Rommel). But as the
military becomes involved across the spectrum of conflict, this misunderstood
leadership trait becomes more important.
Humility, or the
quality of genuine modesty and unpretentiousness, is often disregarded when
describing traits of good leaders because it seems to suggest a lack of
toughness and resolve essential in an effective leader. However, the humble
leader lacks arrogance, not aggressiveness. The will to serve others eclipses
any drive to promote self. Humility can even carry a certain spiritual tone, as
the leaders activities are free of ego and self-aggrandizement
.all in the best
interest of the success of many versus the prominence of an individual.
US Army Field Manual
22-100, Army
Leadership,
details values, attributes, skills and actions necessary in leaders at all
levels. Values and attributes describe leaders of character; skills and actions
define competence. But leaders of character and competence are not necessarily
compelling.
Self-efficacy, enthusiasm,
activity level, rate of talk and extroversion do not appear in US Army leadership
doctrine, although they are common leadership terms elsewhere.1 Many
lists of leadership characteristics overlook the essential component or components
that meld the leader.s attributes with the leaders techniques. One such
component is humility.
In Small
Unit Leadership.A Commonsense
Approach,
author Mike Malone articulates what humility is and what it looks like. He
lists sixteen leadership traits and encourages leaders to:
§ Ensure
soldiers are rewarded when they perform well.
§ Emphasize
how significant the soldier is to the unit.
§ Describe
the unit.s performance in terms of what we did. not .what I did..2
Indeed, the description
above could readily apply to many organizations by simply removing the word
.soldiers. and replacing it with an appropriate substitute. Interestingly,
organizations outside the military have begun to value the importance of
humility in leaders, being particularly reflective, as we engage the adventures
of a new millennium.
Time
magazine.s
millennium edition describes the contributions of three of the world.s greatest
leaders:
.Roosevelt, Gandhi,
Einstein. Three inspiring characters, each representing a different force of history
in the past century. They were about as different as any three men are likely
to be. Yet each in his own way, both intentionally and not, taught us the
century.s most important lesson: the value of being both humble and humane. . .
. Gandhi was the earthly embodiment of humility . . . he taught us that we
should value the civil liberties and individual rights of other human beings,
and he lived for (and was killed for) preaching tolerance and pluralism.
By exhibiting these
virtues, which the century has amply taught us are essential to civilization,
we express the humility and humanity that come from respecting people who are
different from us..3
.Einstein taught the
greatest humility of all: that we are but a speck in an unfathomable large universe.
Roosevelt came to empathize with the poor and the underprivileged, with people
to whom fate had dealt a difficult hand.. 4
What does humility look
like in a military leader? Humility is not a permanent characteristic. It can
be lost or gained since human virtues are imperfect representations of the
ideal. An individual may be taught humility by a parent, teacher, coach or
mentor.
Or one may be humbled
following a profound public embarrassment so significant as to be life changing
and value-altering. In another instance, one may acquire humility after being
in an important position and realizing the pervasive influences of time and
good fortune.
When authentic humility
is applied to relationships, mutual trust develops and stirs an abiding
sense of loyalty and
authentic modesty. Creating an environment to achieve great things.
In its purest sense,
leading by example means modeling for subordinates the very virtues desired in
them. Leaders who direct their attention and effort toward what they give
rather than what they will receive enhance group performance.
The overarching theme
of leadership becomes more clear. Unpretentious service to others before self. humility.
Humility is uncommon.
The temptation of ego enhancement often entices many young leaders down the
road to frustration and compromise. To develop as a leader requires one to
learn from mistakes and deal with adversity. To do this requires requires admitting
fallibility, an act of humility. There is little room for arrogance or cynicism
in truly great leadership.
Currently, the US military
is spread all over the world dealing with a multitude of cultures, many vastly
different from western ones. Peacekeeping operations, by their very nature,
demand cultural awareness and sensitivity. Working in such environments requires
a certain level of humility. Service to others before self. Loud, obnoxious,
arrogant .mediation. simply will not achieve compromise during a town meeting
between Albanians and Serbs.
In contrast to the
unique nature and environment of peace operations, one could argue that a lack
of humility would be acceptable in high-intensity operations.
However, the need for
stable leaders with authentic humility remains constant. Indeed, humility transcends
context to permeate every action of the leader, renewing credibility and
trustworthiness, regardless of the situation, operation or intensity.
Humility must never be
viewed as a weakness. Quite the contrary. A leader who can maintain an unpretentious
disposition will likely inspire a sense of camaraderie and esprit de corps. A
confident leader will demonstrate service in the best interest of the unit by freely
accepting accountability for the troops. actions, being humble enough to admit
fallibility when in error. Success is all about .team.
and .we,. not .you. and
.me.. The humble, effective leader understands that the success is for the unit,
not the individual.
Do you need humility
to be considered a leader? The short answer is no. But to the extent that
character matters in leadership, authentic humility in the leader will
assuredly engender trust and collaborative effort within the organization as the
group aspires to great achievement. MR
NOTES
1. Bernard M. Bass and Ralph M. Stogdill,
Handbook
of Leadership (New York: The Free Press, July 1990), 88.
2. Dandridge .Mike. Malone, Small Unit
leadership .
A
Commonsense Approach (Novato, CA: Presidio Press, May 1995).
3. Walter Isaacson, .Who Mattered and
Why,. Time
(December
1999), 60.
4. Doris K Goodwin, .Franklin Delano
Roosevelt,. Time
(December
1999), 99.
No comments:
Post a Comment